Turkish opposition party files case against paper at centre of bugging row
Web NTVMSNBC   
NTVMSNBC'yi açılış sayfam yap
Türkiye
Ergenekon Davası
Politika
Dış politika
Genel
Polis - adliye
Yerel
Video
Foto Galeri
Türkiye
Dünya
Ekonomi
Spor
Teknoloji
Sağlık
Kültür Sanat
Yaşam
Hava Yol
Yeşil Ekran
Eğitim
Moda
Otomobil
Doğuş Yayın Grubu
NTV
CNBC-e
e2
NTVSPOR.NET
NBA TV
NTV Radyo
Eksen 96.2
Radio N101
NTV Yayınları
N. Geographic
 
NTVMSNBC Anasayfa » Türkiye » ENGLISH

Turkish opposition party files case against paper at centre of bugging row

Lawyers for the CHP said the bugging must have been carried out using advanced technology.

 DİĞER HABERLER

  GÜNCEL - EN ÇOK OKUNAN HABERLER

Güncelleme: 19:08 TSİ 30 Mayıs 2008 Cuma

ANKARA - Turkey’s opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP) has filed a criminal complaint against the newspaper Vakit over the daily’s printing of details from a private telephone conversation of a senior party official allegedly obtained through bugging.
Haberin devamı

Lawyers for the CHP submitted the petition supporting the complaint to the office of the Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor’s on Friday. In its complaint, the CHP accuses Vakit’s owner and two of its writers of illegally publishing excerpts of a conversation between the party’s secretary general, Onder Sav, and former Governor Ali Serendag, which took place in Sav’s office on May 23, in its May 26 edition.

The petition said that while the identity of those who carried out the illegal bugging was unknown, it was certain to whom they provided the contents of the illegal tap.
In their petition, the CHP’s lawyers said the act was a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Turkish Penal Code.

As no bugging devices were found in the CHP headquarters during a search after the article was printed, it had to be assumed the monitoring took place from a distance.

As the CHP headquarters are equipped with high technology security and surveillance systems, the lawyers said it was impossible for someone to enter the building unnoticed or unchecked and that visitors were escorted by security personnel through the corridors and common areas which are at the same time monitored with surveillance cameras. “Recordings from these cameras were thoroughly examined and no unusual thing was noticed,” the lawyers said.

The petition said both the conducting of the monitoring from a distance and the exact match of the actual conversation with the excerpts published by Vakit showed that the technology used was very advanced.

“Only professionals and special teams possess these advanced devices and technologies,” the petition said. “Plus, as can also be understood from the news stories that appeared in the press and on television, the producers of these technologies can sell their products to only States under permission granted to them by their country’s authorities.”

 

Bu habere oy ver
Düşük
1 Puan 2 Puan 3 Puan 4 Puan 5 Puan 6 Puan 7 Puan 8 Puan 9 Puan 10 Puan
Yüksek
     •  En çok puan alan haberler

Yazdır Gönder Görüş yaz/ oku

                        Bu habere henüz yorum yapılmamış


Ana Sayfa | Türkiye | Dünya | Ekonomi | Sağlık | Yaşam | Teknoloji | Kültür Sanat | Doğal Hayat | Eğitim | Moda
Spor | Hava Yol | İletişim | Yardım | İzleyici Görüşleri | Reklam Seçenekleri | Hukuki Şartlar & Gizlilik Hakları